Theme 5: Design research
During these
week, actually we have 2 seminars, but Mr. Haibo Li had to postpone his seminar
on next Monday because an illness, so in this week we only have one seminar
conducted by Eva-Lotta Sallnäs Pysander. In this reflection I wrote about what
I get from the first seminar, and if possible I will add the reflection in the second
seminar with Mr. Haibo Li.
In the First
seminar, we had a presentation by Sallnäs. Early in the seminar, she told us
that when doing qualitative method sometimes can lead us to the quantitative
analysis. For example, the quantitative method usually used when we conduct
interviews and content analysis in our experiment. Sometimes in the long run,
we need to count the key word and make some analysis with this, and in this
process we need quantitative method to analyze the data. It is why the
collaboration method between quantitative and qualitative data can bring more
evidence on the research. After that, she giving lectures about his paper about
how to make the playground more engaging using digital media and computer
gaming, especially using the haptic system.
Haptic
perception is defined as perception in which both cutaneous sense and
kinesthesis convey significant information about distal objects and events. Haptic
system unifies input from many sources. For example, pressure point, heat,
cold, softness into a unitary experience. Overall, with haptic guidance, it can
show where to go and how to perform a procedure. Furthermore haptic guidance
can replace verbal communication on solving certain task. She also mentions if
anyone of us interested in haptic for our master thesis, we can contact her for
further instruction.
During second
seminar, Mr. Haibo Li gives us an interesting presentation about the importance
of an idea. I find this lecture is more attractive and have a close
relationship with today theme. First, he says the importance how to define the
real problem and solve it. Furthermore, he gives us his own theory regarding to
solve a problem. It says “10% time to defining a problem and 90% time to solve
it”. Secondly, when evaluation an idea, we need to validate it with math
equations and make sure it can generate money in the future. Thirdly, we need
to validate the idea before presenting it. We need to build a prototype of the
idea and specify the product potential based upon our own interest and needs.
This prototype must validate and pass the test on effectiveness, efficiency and
satisfaction in particular environments. Lastly, in order to convey your idea,
you need to acquire technical communication to present your idea to the
company. One of the methods we can use is to practice an effective elevator
pitch, because we only have 3 minutes in the early presentation to give an impression
about the importance of our idea.
Hi! I can tell that you liked Haibo's lecture as many of us did. What did you like the most with it, and why did you find it interesting? I found his lecture interesting because some of the things he said are things I can take with me in my future work. Today, I probably don't put enough time to define a problem before I try to solve it and I could definitely see why it is beneficial to communicate my ideas with the "elevator pitch" for example. So the methods I use when defining a problem and communicating ideas are things I will put more effort into in the future. Did you take something with you from Haibo's lecture that you think can become useful in you future work?
ReplyDeleteHi, thanks for your comment.
DeleteYes, I agree with your opinion about why Haibo's lecture is more lively. Overall, I think both of them is quite good when delivering their material. However, if Sallnäs more concern about the collaboration then it would be perfect.
During Haibo Li presentation, I have an insight about the importance of communicating our research to generate an income. Because, as a researcher, we usually ignore this thing. Typically, we just want to solve the problem as efficient as it may, but only a few of us can make it a product that useful for the community, furthermore to generate additional income for the researcher
Hi Muhammed,
ReplyDeleteGood reflections. I liked Haibo Li’s lecture about defining a problem. I think he has right considering putting more effort in defining the problem instead of putting so much effort in solving the problem. But my question is then, is that always the case? Sometimes you might already have a defined problem or sometimes the problem is very easy to define? Don’t you think that could happen?