Theme 2: Critical media studies
After
attending the lecture and seminar in the critical media studies, I gain a new
perspective about philosophy. In the previous theme we get a knowledge about
what is the knowledge itself and how it can be obtained. This week we have progressed
a bit further about the enlightenment which is give a liberation of human
though to advance in order to gain freedom to get rid of fear of superstitious
things and instead install them as masters of their own fears and thoughts. But
in the end it gives us many casualties to the humankind. In this theme, we
assigned to read 2 articles. The first article is written by Walter Benjamin
and the second is written by Adorno and Horkheimer’s.
In
the lecturer session, Mr. Henrik Åhman told us that in order to understand these
essay, we need to know the background history when they create these essay. So
in this lecture, he gives us some background story when philosophy began. Start
in early 16th / 17th century, people gain an enlightenment
and obtain an advance progress on technology since that era. Furthermore, with
this enlightenment, people begin to create a utopian object around the world,
for the example is France and Russian revolution. Also in the art and
construction, they built many skyscrapers and lead to invention in media
technology. Nevertheless, in several years later the utopian is coming to the
end, because industries have a lot of bad consequences, such as pollution and
war for resources. In the end, the enlightenment will dehumanize people and
they are starting to question about enlightenment because they caused the crisis.
Walter
Benjamin, when he write the essay about “The Work of Art in the Age of
Mechanical Reproduction” live in the era of Nazi, when they still not declare a
war to the world. In this essay, he shows how fascism do with culture and
handle the culture to support fascism. In this essay, he state that culture and
politics are related. Furthermore, fascism introduces aesthetic into political
life. For example, in Italian fascism, they attempt to aestheticize politics.
In order to get support from his people, they revive the glory of the Roman
Empire and they believe people need other stuff than just rational and
argument. Also in German, they used a
different approach, it is to politicize aesthetics. German develop massive
structure or art to give an enormous influence emotional to the people and
because of that they will accept all political messages from some political
party. In this era, they also use media technology to deceive people to follow
their will.
Adorno
and Hokheimer’s write the essay to answer the essay by Walter Benjamin, in this
essay they critique about the media technology is being misused and abused by
others to gain support in politics. Based on Adorno and Hokheimer’s,
enlightenment is trying to demystify the world and give freedom to people to think
freely, but in the end instead to give freedom, they deceive us into a big
society that force to believe a certain paradigm with using media technology.
They also emphasize that nominalism will lead to preservation of oppressive societal
culture, because if we only focus on the material world and describe as it is,
then we are never going to change. The lecturer gives an excellent example
about the nominalism by using Plato story about “man in cave”. He shows that
there is dichotomy reality about is it true that shadow is real things (nominalism)?
Or we should turn around to look the concept itself.
Hi Haky, I really like your reflection on this topic, and share your viewpoint with respect to these readings, particularly knowing the cultural, political and social context help me a lot in order to understand the ideas that the authors wanted to transmit.
ReplyDeleteLike you said above, I think that social framework will prevent that we could have plenty liberty as concept of Enlightenment pretend that we should have. Enlightenment despite releasing the humanity of fear of the unknown, made us prisoners of a social paradigm fomented by media technologies.
Hi, thanks for your comment.
DeleteYeah, it is helpful to know the background of the person when they write a text. So, we can get a whole idea why they create this essay or text. Some of the background information is like you say above.
And I agree to your statement, although media technology can bring a positive influence to the humanity, on the other hand it also can control public opinion if there is no control to the media itself. So, I think without a proper control, it can be a double edge sword.