Theme 1: Theory of knowledge and theory of
science
In the first week of the course,
we got a nice start to study about philosophy. At first, I think this course is
a rather difficult for me to begin with, because I have no experience when
reading about philosophy. The first reading is the book created by Immanuel
Kant (Critique of Pure Reason), this book is hard to understand and takes more
time to acknowledge it. The second reading is the dialog between Socrates and
Teaetethus, and this is easier to understand, although there are many parts
that not necessarily belong there.
Kant lived in the 17th
Century when the scientific revolution begins. In that they divided by an
idealist and realist, and Kant try to avoid both of them and propose a transcendental
idealism that he describes in his book of Critique of Pure Reason. In this
book, Kant distinguishes propositions in 3 types:
- Analytic Judgment: Do not
have investigate the word to seek the truth (A Priori). For example: Body
have an extension. (The definition of “body” must have extensions).
- Synthetic Judgment: Need
to investigate to seek the truth (A Posteriori). For example: Somebody is thick.
(Thick is not inherent with body, so need to examine further)
- Synthetic a priori. For example: Geometric, Math, and Metaphysics.
"How is
a synthetic judgment possible a priory?” To answer this question, Kant takes an
example about the Copernican Revolution and make a deduction that lets we assumed
that all our cognition must not conform to objects, but the objects must conform
to our cognition. This is the basic perspective on Kant investigation, to
assume that the object must conform our fact of knowledge and must fulfill 2 forms
of intuition:
- Knowledge of the world is
structured and organized according to Time and Space.
- Meet the requirement of 12 different categories of understanding (Unity, Plurality, Totality, Reality, Negation, Limitation, Possibility, Existence, Necessity, Substance, Causality and Community)
In the
dialog between Socrates and Teaetethus, they said the knowledge is perception,
and Socrates argues that we do not see and hear "with" the eyes and
the ears, but "through" the eyes and the ears. Within this statement,
Kant sees that eyes and ears only see only with certain framework, and we
cannot get a whole picture of the object because we ignore all other senses.
Therefore, to get the knowledge we must get a whole picture and see it through
our soul to get the general truth about the knowledge.
In the
seminar, Mr. Johan Eriksson gives us an excellent example about philosophy in
Immanuel Kant perspective. He says “The Matrix” movie have a close relationship
with Kant philosophy. It shows us there is certain reality that we can accept
as it is (Take It for Granted) or we can criticize this new fact as it is real
truth or only an imagination. It is like Neo when decide to take red pill or
blue pill.
Well written, you have managed to include most parts that we went through in the lecture and seminar. It would also be interesting if you reflected or argued more for or against their opinions, they are not necessarily correct in their views.
ReplyDeleteHehe, I like the Matrix reference. I didn't think of that and he didn't present that comparison in my seminar group. :)
Hi, thanks for your comment.
DeleteI believe that the comparison to Matrix Film was the key to understand the texts.
Furthermore, I think it is easy to understand a lecture if it is design like a movie.
It was really helpfully.